National Driller Magazine
  Home
  Subscribe to ICS L!VE
  Subscribe
  ICS L!VE
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  ICS Bulletin Board
  CFC Bulletin Board
  Editor's Blog
  Breaking News
  Calendar
  Career Center
  Contest
  Podcasts
  Case Studies
  Webinars
  Current Issue
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Industry News
  Products
  Resources
  Archives
  Classifieds
  Trade Directory + Buying Guide
  AEC Store
  Product Info (Free)
  Industry Links
  Truckmount Showcases
  Video Archive
  eNewsletter Archive
  Market Research
  Special Collections
  CFC Archives
  ICS Info
  Media Kit
  Submission Information
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
White Paper Questions Validity of CRI SOA Program

June 3, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



RACINE, Wisc. – [June 3, 2010] – Racine Industries (RI) today released a new peer-reviewed white paper that examines the methods of using x-ray spectrometry (XRF) for testing carpet cleaning extractors, systems and vacuums. These methods are used to establish rankings in the Carpet & Rug Institute (CRI) Seal of Approval (SOA) program.

Findings from the study released today suggest that it is premature to conclude that the testing accomplishes the stated objective of quantifying soil levels in carpet and encourages further research before there is widespread acceptance of the SOA program.

The current SOA program created in a partnership among CRI, Professional Testing Laboratory (PTL) and a manufacturer of XRF technology, was developed with the intention of establishing an industry standard for testing cleaning performance.

“Our study raises questions about the methodology used to establish SOA rankings of cleaning performance,” said Deborah Lema, Research & Training Associate, Racine Industries. “This method has not been scientifically validated. It has not been reviewed by independent peer reviewers. Also, scientific accuracy, precision and bias have not been determined. It is our objective to encourage careful examination before the program sees mainstream adoption through any additional environmental certification standards or legislative entities.”

Further, no correlation between field and laboratory results has been established.

Questions arising from the RI study include:
  • Will an independent validation study be planned and completed?
  • Will a protocol be released?
  • Will the reported concentrations of the compounds be reproducible outside of the one licensed laboratory performing this method?
  • Will a Determination of Relevance be conducted to see if the laboratory-generated results actually apply to the field?
  • Will accuracy and bias be determined and published if not improved?
Without these determinations, the question of whether or not this method generates useful and relevant data cannot be answered. The RI study suggests that consumers and carpet industry professionals should be hesitant to rely on SOA approvals for decision making, and should question the appropriateness and merit of SOA approval being requisite in carpet warranties, environmental standards and legislation.

For a full copy of the study, go to www.carpetdiemblog.com.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.














BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy